The Effect of Prior Authorization on Healthcare Access: Barriers, Delays, and Solutions
Explore the effect of prior authorization on healthcare access, leading to treatment delays and administrative burdens. Learn about the challenges patients and providers face and discover potential solutions to improve timely care. Read more!
How Can A Virtual Medical Assistant Help Your Practice?
See how Portiva is making a real difference in medical practices through our clients’ experiences. Watch this short video to see the impact for yourself, and let’s talk about how we can help streamline your operations and improve patient care today!
Table of Contents
Healthcare providers or insurers use prior authorization as one of the PA cost control methods to evaluate if a service, medication, or prescribed procedure needs medical attention before confirming coverage. While intended to enhance care, reduce wasteful spending through prior authorization, processes have become burdensome to patients and healthcare providers alike. The combination of administrative hurdles, patients’ medical needs, and treatment wait time has elicited discussions on how best to revise the prior authorization to improve healthcare access without contravening patient autonomy, especially when considering the effect of prior authorization on healthcare access.
In this article, we delve into the impact of prior authorization concerning healthcare access and patient care, clinical outcomes, and healthcare systems. We also analyze policy considerations from various industry stakeholders and prior authorization policy reforms aimed at lessening red tape while providing prompt care.
Need Prior Authorization Differentiation Policies
Health plans and insurance provides often require prior authorization differentiation policies for prescribed healthcare services and drugs to ensure alignment with the relevant clinical guidelines.
Medicare Advantage insurers and state-funded healthcare programs claim that the PA process helps control costs and makes sure resources in healthcare are being utilized properly. On the contrary, the American Medical Association (AMA) and other medical groups have voiced concern over the increasing prior authorization requests. Increasingly, medical specialties from cardiology to behavioral health report experiencing enhanced administrative workloads and concurrent delays in patient care stemming from multifaceted and contradictory prior authorization workflows.
The Load on Healthcare Providers
Healthcare providers have to spend a lot of time managing complex prior authorization requirements, often navigating multiple steps for each request, particularly when dealing with different health plans that have varying policies. Research indicates that respondents reported physicians routinely spend multiple hours each week in the office dealing with PA prerequisites, leading to additional office visits and taking their attention away from direct patient interactions, underscoring the need for reducing administrative burdens to allow providers to focus more on patient care. This is especially tough for smaller practices that don’t have enough staff to keep up with the growing administrative burdens tied to slow and complicated insurance communications.
The AMA says that nearly a quarter of physicians report that prior authorization requests have caused serious detrimental effects to patient outcomes. These events illustrate the importance of diminishing administrative work requirements and improving interactions with insurers.
Holdups and Refusals in Patient Care
Payers of health services often impose overly strict and arbitrary limits on medical services, investigations, and prescription medication that patients can receive out of their allotted funding, and require insurance approval to be ‘pre-authorized’ prior to providing the patient with the service, leading to significant prior authorization delays that hinder timely care.
Among the myriad of procedures requiring prior authorization, one of the highly critical ones is driven by the need to slow down step therapy and medication initiation. Because of such lag, assistance cannot be rendered relevantly on time to patients who require immediate surgical treatment. Too often, the denial or delay of the prior authorization approval process results in treatment delays, causing unmanageable care delays in accessing vital medical aids, medications, and diagnostic procedures, ultimately impacting patient outcomes.
These lags cannot be viewed as simple delays prior authorization led setbacks can result in severe exacerbations of clinical conditions, forced admission to hospitals, and even worse outcomes. In the context of chronic ailments or behavioral health challenges, delays in the commencement of treatment might hinder patient outcomes.
Burden of PAs on Clinical Practice
Impact of PAs on Patient Care
The Consequences on Clinical Effectiveness.
Clinical effectiveness is severely impacted by gaps within the care continuum, with nearly a quarter of patients experiencing a significant delay in receiving care due to prior authorization downgrades or deferments, underscoring the impact of these delays on patient outcomes. Clients traversing through multiple barriers to obtain the care they require may opt out entirely. For instance, the prerequisite stricture, step therapy, which is frequently included in PA protocols, compels patients to attempt cheaper alternatives before considering the original treatment suggestion.
Step therapy, while it enhances cost efficiency, often overlooks the most latest clinical evidence and the context of the logic provided by the medical practitioner. This results in reduced treatment effectiveness, increased adverse effects, and prolonged time for achieving optimal response to therapy.
See What Our Clients Have to Say!
Learn how our expert solutions have helped businesses achieve their goals and drive success. Join our satisfied customers and experience the difference today!
Boost your Efficiency with
Portiva's Virtual Medical Assistant Services
Insurance Company Aims Versus Medical Necessity
There is always a conflict between an insurance company’s cost containment strategy and a physician’s medical necessity determination. Providers concentrate on patient care and the patient’s experience, focusing on patient well being, while health insurers focus on controlling spending and resources to be used, often creating a disconnect between the medical community and insurers.
When prior authorization decisions base more on expenditures rather than clinical need, patients tend to experience negative outcomes. The inconsistency between an insurer’s and a medical practitioner’s perspective may lead to loss of trust and compromise the quality of care offered to patients.
Medicare advantage and Medicaid services
Medicare advantage insurers and Medicaid services administered face the misfortune of having too much prior authorization requirements. Participants enrolled in Medicare Advantage and Medicaid programs face harsh prior authorization thresholds for medical services such as advanced imaging, specialty consultations, , and even prescription drugs, adding complexity and delays to their care. These challenges are mainly experienced by elderly people and other vulnerable members of society.
Moves toward changing prior authorization for the groups include those aimed at enabling seniors’ access to care and seeking the removal of unnecessary barriers. The Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) has come out openly admitting their lack of change and searching ways to enable the streamlining process.
The Internet of Things in Healthcare
One of the suggestions to ameliorate the inefficiencies emanating from prior authorization is its integration into the electronic health record systems (EHRs). Integrating PA functionalities into workflow processes allows assist devices to capture clinician notes and less time on repetitive tasks. Unfortunately, there are still gaps in implementing these tools, and many PA procedures are not compatible with available EHRs.
Moreover, health plans need to upgrade to technologies that enable real-time interactions and decisions regarding health actions. Unless both providers and insurers agree to alter their readiness for automated systems, attempts to automate PA will not achieve their intended outcomes.
Authorization Policies and Access to Mental Health Services
Once again, access to mental health care services prompts a discussion due to its association with prior authorization. Therapy, psychiatric evaluations, and medication management often face significant delays due to prior authorization requirements, which are especially problematic given the time-sensitive nature of behavioral health care. The sensitive nature of mental health conditions makes them time-critical, and health plans must be particularly cautious in applying prior authorization requirements that could delay access to essential care.
Advocates striving for mental health parity claim that treatment equity calls for the rethinking of prior authorization criteria. The American Medical Association has been actively pushing for prior authorization reforms that prioritize patient welfare and aim to lessen the administrative burden on parental gatekeeping.
The Consequences of Denying Patients Access to Services
Patients often experience serious adverse events as a consequence of strict prior authorization requirements, including prior authorization led treatment delays or outright denials. These events—ranging from fainting spells to hospitalization or worsening of diseases—are often the result of prior authorization denials that delay or restrict timely treatment. The documentation of severe adverse events due to bureaucratic hurdles captures the essence of the impact such a system has.
Doctors have begun to call for evidentiary PA policies bearing the most current clinical data. Taking responsibility for faster response times, unreasonably lengthy appeal processes, and claiming the responsibility to avert injuring the patients will help keep them safe as well.
The Contribution of the American Medical Association
In other instances, the American Medical Association tends to possess a strong stance on translating policies that re-evaluate prior authorization.
Working with other partners, the AMA has published white papers, conducted surveys, and engaged in political lobbying to help ease the administrative strain that comes with PA.
Their recommendations include:
Restricting PA to only relevant services and drugs that truly need to be reviewed
Establishing specific timelines within which responses are to be provided
Health IT to be used for PA submission and processing
Establishment of gold card programs that relieve high approval rate providers from prior authorization requirements
Patient Advocacy and Public Opinion
Patient advocacy groups have joined the conversation and have also been critical of the prior authorization process and its delays at every step. The narratives surrounding care postponements, prescription rejections, and surgical refusals have circulated widely, creating renewed demand for insurance provider to justify their practices.
Many have voiced growing frustration over what they see as an overly bureaucratic system—one that puts profits over patients and adds unnecessary administrative burdens at every step of the care process.. If any meaningful change is to come, the patients who are directly impacted need to be brought in to actively participate in PA reform discussions. Trust in the healthcare system can only be built back by incorporating patients in the redesign processes.
Shift of Policies and Reforms in Legislation
Numerous states have enacted laws aimed at implementing prior authorization reforms that simplify procedures and reduce delays in care delivery. These laws frequently include timelines for making approval determinations, mandatory disclosure of PA criteria, better appeal procedures, and disclosures concerning the Protected Health Information (PHI) that were withheld in the PA criteria and processes. On the other hand, there is an increasing bipartisan concern over administrative burden in healthcare at the national level.
Significant policy propositions contain the “Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act,” which intends to update prior authorization procedures in Medicare Advantage. This encompasses a requirement for real-time electronic prior authorization and better defined protocols for clinically necessary care determinations as well
The Economic Cost of Prior Authorization
In addition to the administrative and clinical challenges, economic burdens stem from prior authorization. PA requires a great deal of both human and material resources from providers. Furthermore, patients have the possibility of incurring additional costs from denied or delayed treatment. These expenses flow through the healthcare system and thus diminish efficiency while straining public and private resources.
Streamlining PA processes, considering the expense of these services, would most likely improve the expense efficiency of the system. The removal of duplicative reviews as well as automation of basic approval tasks has the potential to reduce expenses by billions every year.
Reform Prior Authorization: A Path Forwards
The prior authorization process can be improved through the collaboration of various stakeholders in a way that considers cost management and patient care. This entails improving the setting of prior authorization approval thresholds, strengthening accountability, enhancing health information technology, and ensuring that PA workflows align with the clinically appropriate care guidelines.
Physicians, the American Medical Association, patient advocacy groups, legislative aides, and other policymakers need to come together and design a better system that is effective, humane, and compassionate. Reforming PA is not simply red tape to be dealt with, rather it is about ensuring that there is injustice in timely and equitable healthcare.
Conclusion: Ensuring Engaging Access With Focus On Patients
While prior authorization is used to manage costs, it has been transformed into the control gate of care access. Almost all medical professionals, patient advocates alongside and many others agree that healthcare systems are over burdened by these gatekeeping systems at the expense of patients to receive basic and necessary healthcare services.
There needs to be a shift in focus from evidence-based clinical caregiving documents towards transactional paperwork, alongside the evolving technologies that put forward prior authorization systems and processes focused on care accessibility. It is about defining and setting proper boundaries around essential work and redefining, setting, and taking off boundaries that shield non-essentials and shield essentials.
The prior authorization process has had an impact one way or another on healthcare access and now it is time we improved the system for everyone.
- Quality assurance in prior authorization for balancing timeliness
- Reducing errors in prior authorization for better efficiency
- Promoting the use of prior authorization policies
- Must-haves for a successful preauthorization implementation
- Staying updated with prior authorization services
- Securing the future with precertification tech
- Implementing prior authorization security
- Mastering prior authorization compliance
- Educating patients on prior authorization
- Patient’s access to prior authorization
- Impact of prior authorization on healthcare
- Prior authorization and law
- Controlling outsourced precertification services
- Experiencing balance with preauthorization services
- How remote medical scribes influence preauthorization
- Navigating common pitfalls in preauthorization
- The importance of a speedy preauthorization process
- Essential provider training for efficient prior authorization
- Impact of recent prior authorization policy changes
